First let me take it clear that this column is about organizations which self identify as "liberal or "conservative" such as the NRA and the ACLU and any individuals that wholly accepts and identifies with either organizations dogmatic & absolutist viewpoints. Secondly, I am focusing here on only 2 issues, and each of these organizations viewpoints on these issues because I believe no other organizations nor issues wield such influence, adhere to more dogmatic absolutism as these two issues and these two organizations. So basically I believe that these two organizations conduct and viewpoints on these two issues are poster children for what is wrong with each camp as well as their brands of conservatism and liberalism, both of which are totally morally and ethically bankrupt.
All I have to do then is right a few sentences about each and their extreme viewpoints on each issue to illustrate what is wrong and what is different from mainstream thought about each issue and then a statement in the end, one sentence as to what their real agenda is and why they adhere to these extreme, blatantly wrong, decidedly non-liberal positions.
The issues are of course gun control and abortion. First gun control: Most of the gun toting NRA members a know, carry their manhood on their hips and that's why they are so vehement about there never being an restrictions against their deadly weapons, simply because it threatens their manhood. For NRA members who are women, likewise, in fact , gun control is a threat to her manhood as well because real women who like guns, don't have the fragile adolescent-like male egos that most men retain throughout their lives. We have have MORE important familial considerations, such as or children's health care and education about things OTHER THAN how to kill stuff efficiently with a .45. in other words, REAL MEN and REAL WOMEN are ARE NOT one issue voters like the NRA and it's members members and ACLU and it's members and followers are. Never mind that scores of completely innocent people in the USA nearly every month get gunned down and their civil right ABSOLUTELY violated by people that any sane person agrees should never have had access to a deadly weapon of any kind. We are talking about felons, mentally disturbed people and children who kill scores of people each year.
And of course the extreme solution of the ACLU is to ban all guns and that the constitution does not protect the right at all. As always, the truth is somewhere between these two tyrannical organizations, both of which appear within an hour at the site of the latest police shooting of a minority screaming that the true "victim" is the minority or the cop that shot him BEFORE ANY INVESTIGATION IS EVEN LAUNCHED into the incident and the press is only too happy to oblige both with out so much as a single actual fact among the reams of newsprint and video.
Now abortion: the extremist View of the ACLU and other "liberal" organizations is that if it ain't popped out of the vagina in 9 months a woman has the unquestionable right to end the life within even via late term abortions in which the fetus, now a real baby with a budding personality living inside the woman can be removed from the womb and executed at the woman's request.
Likewise to the "conservatives", life starts when the sperm enters the ovum, that single cell is now a human being with the same conscious and right to life as you and I which simply isn't true.
Here is what I believe how personhood should be defined:
Drs legally and medically certify a person's death is when there ceases to be any heart beat, lung activity AND most importantly brain function as measured by devices used for detecting brain activity. That's the legal and medical definition of death and therefore should be the legal and medical definition of human life, WHICH BEGINS AT THE END OF THE FIRST TRIMESTER, not at conception. To have one measurement of life and another of death is hypocritical, dogmatic and controlling and to say that saving lives life should give way to gun rights is equally so.
So what is going on with these two organizations: it's simple, it's a struggle for control over political agendas and as many people as possible in order for the leaders to satisfy one of humanity's inborn urges: control and power over others. In fact NEITHER view has anything to do With true liberalism or true conservatism because the true form of both PUTS PEOPLE"S LIVES AND WELL BEING FIRST and neither of these two views or these to organizations do that. A true liberal person like me recoils at the thought of ANYONE having the right to end the life of a beautiful newborn baby just by virtue of the fact that it's not liberated from the womb in time to be visually identified & recognized as the new person that it is.
So both organizations and the extreme views they hold about both issues is morally unsupportable, neither one are what they claim to be and both are about lies, dogma and control over a political system that is all to happy to bow to their filthy never-ending thirst for power views for votes and power themselves.
All I have to do then is right a few sentences about each and their extreme viewpoints on each issue to illustrate what is wrong and what is different from mainstream thought about each issue and then a statement in the end, one sentence as to what their real agenda is and why they adhere to these extreme, blatantly wrong, decidedly non-liberal positions.
The issues are of course gun control and abortion. First gun control: Most of the gun toting NRA members a know, carry their manhood on their hips and that's why they are so vehement about there never being an restrictions against their deadly weapons, simply because it threatens their manhood. For NRA members who are women, likewise, in fact , gun control is a threat to her manhood as well because real women who like guns, don't have the fragile adolescent-like male egos that most men retain throughout their lives. We have have MORE important familial considerations, such as or children's health care and education about things OTHER THAN how to kill stuff efficiently with a .45. in other words, REAL MEN and REAL WOMEN are ARE NOT one issue voters like the NRA and it's members members and ACLU and it's members and followers are. Never mind that scores of completely innocent people in the USA nearly every month get gunned down and their civil right ABSOLUTELY violated by people that any sane person agrees should never have had access to a deadly weapon of any kind. We are talking about felons, mentally disturbed people and children who kill scores of people each year.
And of course the extreme solution of the ACLU is to ban all guns and that the constitution does not protect the right at all. As always, the truth is somewhere between these two tyrannical organizations, both of which appear within an hour at the site of the latest police shooting of a minority screaming that the true "victim" is the minority or the cop that shot him BEFORE ANY INVESTIGATION IS EVEN LAUNCHED into the incident and the press is only too happy to oblige both with out so much as a single actual fact among the reams of newsprint and video.
Now abortion: the extremist View of the ACLU and other "liberal" organizations is that if it ain't popped out of the vagina in 9 months a woman has the unquestionable right to end the life within even via late term abortions in which the fetus, now a real baby with a budding personality living inside the woman can be removed from the womb and executed at the woman's request.
Likewise to the "conservatives", life starts when the sperm enters the ovum, that single cell is now a human being with the same conscious and right to life as you and I which simply isn't true.
Here is what I believe how personhood should be defined:
Drs legally and medically certify a person's death is when there ceases to be any heart beat, lung activity AND most importantly brain function as measured by devices used for detecting brain activity. That's the legal and medical definition of death and therefore should be the legal and medical definition of human life, WHICH BEGINS AT THE END OF THE FIRST TRIMESTER, not at conception. To have one measurement of life and another of death is hypocritical, dogmatic and controlling and to say that saving lives life should give way to gun rights is equally so.
So what is going on with these two organizations: it's simple, it's a struggle for control over political agendas and as many people as possible in order for the leaders to satisfy one of humanity's inborn urges: control and power over others. In fact NEITHER view has anything to do With true liberalism or true conservatism because the true form of both PUTS PEOPLE"S LIVES AND WELL BEING FIRST and neither of these two views or these to organizations do that. A true liberal person like me recoils at the thought of ANYONE having the right to end the life of a beautiful newborn baby just by virtue of the fact that it's not liberated from the womb in time to be visually identified & recognized as the new person that it is.
So both organizations and the extreme views they hold about both issues is morally unsupportable, neither one are what they claim to be and both are about lies, dogma and control over a political system that is all to happy to bow to their filthy never-ending thirst for power views for votes and power themselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment