Disclaimer: this blog post is about avatars on a internet social game called IMVU. For intelligent discourse, see "elsewhere."
Beautiful Brain Sucking Aliens Are Terrorizing IMVU!
Have you ever noticed the "hey! My head it too small... No wait it's too big!" syndrome that female avatars have? I had the diseased. It is caused by the shoulders of the female avatar being way too wide, plus the curious feeding habit of certain alien creatures retrofitted to blend in with the gorgeous females of the human species. Also, if you look at the stock male avatar, his are just right for an average built, not-very-handsome man. But who cares about them, they have to buy their penises and attach them (AP only). Then when I decide it is time to feed and suck their brains out, they get a big smile on their face and want my phone number, whereas when I suck out the brains of a female, she falls over dead like she's supposed to. I still haven't processed that dichotomy in human behavior, but hey, when it's feeding time it's either one female for lunch or several guys, right! (oh, did I forgot to tell you that I'm a beautiful brain eating alien from a far-away galaxy? I started my club 69 Girlz to lure humans in for nourishment but so far I'm starving to death.) Anyway, the Big Head Syndrome is because they put a manly (more than the male) ass and shoulders on the stock female avatar, so in a bust shot, the head looks okay, but pulled back it looks too big. So then somebody resized the head again for the shoulders, but with camera pulled back it looks freakishly pinheaded. So I had a head with lipsticks made, called the Bobbi head, that's in between the "hey my head is too big...no wait it's too small" size and the "hey, somebody sucked my brains out and now I'm a pinhead" size. Actually, I really do best like eating male brains because they come with nifty built in skin-revitalizing facial cream that spontaneously erupts as the last bit of brains comes out that tiny hole in the top of their head.
My Bias: All institutions, forms of government work on paper, but none work in practice because then people have to be involved with our greed, avarice, sloth & general lack of any concept of meaningful ethics and penchant for letting others do our thinking & make our choices. So it's never the idea that's wrong or faulty, it's us.
Showing posts with label muslim. Show all posts
Showing posts with label muslim. Show all posts
Sunday, March 18, 2012
Thursday, February 24, 2011
example of mass ignorance feeding the machine
FB post: "I'm posting this because I'm so OUTRAGED! This little
girl is stoned to death (GRAPHIC) because she did not
want to be the bride of an old Muslim man. This is what
Liberals want in AMERICA! I will fight these sorry excuses
for human beings with ALL I AM! God bless this poor
child!"
Response from Calista Lucille on FB: You idiots. She was stoned
because she fell in love with a Muslim boy. IDIOTS> The
people stoning her are yezidi. She was being hidden and
protected by a Sunni Muslim Imam (my note: I'm assuming
that this writer added the redundant "Muslim" to
Sunni & Imam because she was betting that her ignorant,
ethnocentric audience wouldn't know a Sunni Imam
from a Toyota Corolla!) for weeks, IGNORANT
ASSHOLES! You put Arabic soundtrack over it to make it
look like its Muslims. You are liars and idiots. before you
rush to judgment you should investigate. You want
sources?
17 year old Kurdish girl stoned to death in Kurdistan of
Iraq
According to report by Human Rights Organization of
Kurdistan a 17 year old Kurdish girl named DOA (name
translation: prayer) was publicly stoned to death in... the
Kurdistan province of Iraq . Doa was born to a Yazidi
sect which is a religious minority of the Kurds. Doa was
in a relationship with a Sunni Muslim boy that she
wanted to marry.
At a tribal court, Doa was sentenced to death by stoning.
This gruesome act was filmed but due to the extremely
graphic nature of this film it is not being posted.
Stop Child Execution Campaign strongly condemn such
inhumane practices and requests Government of Iraq,
United States, United Nations, other governments,
human rights organizations and media to demand an
international inquiry to this crime against a young child
and to hold those responsible accountable for this crime
A teenage girl was stoned to death for loving the wrong
boy. Du’a Khalil Aswad, a 17-year old Yezidi girl who
lived in Northern Iraq, fell in love with a Sunni Muslim
boy, and possibly converted to Islam. For this she was
stoned to death in a public "honour killing" which was
recorded on video and spread on the internet (warning:
graphic and disturbing. YouTube took theirs down.) 23
Yezidis have been killed in retaliation. [Via
Disinformation.]
And "she" (stoning victim) Has a Name,
Du'a
Before reading Calista Lucille's post research above, before I
knew any details about this incident, I wrote the following about the FB post that this blog post starts with. Based on my ongoing study of Islam, I wrote: "This
is not Sharia Law. This is a country, region or tribe with
barbaric secular laws claiming to follow Sharia Law that
is not. I am sick of ignorant people letting
strangers literally open the top of your skulls and defecate
"news" about incidents in your brains like this that you
believe and repeat even though you don't know the
source, don't know the subject and don't know the
motive of the reporting party even who the reporter is. If you were a real Muslim, you
would be breaking real Sharia Law.
This falls under part of my axiom that "everything
works fine on paper until people get involved and then
nothing works." But when I say that, I am talking
primarily about Chrisianity& capitalism. All sorts of
horrors have been perpetrated in the name of both and
capitalism recently failed in this country in case you
didn't notice. All Sharia Law is derived from the Quran.
There is no stoning punishment in the Quran. There is ,
only in the Quran stories that Mohammed had
2-3 people stoned in two isntances who came to him and repeatedly
instisted on being punished for their sins. In one
instance the person wanted to be stoned for adultery and
in the other the person wanted to be punished lightly.
But having no Muslim law that covered their requests and
them being Jewish, Mohammed looked to Jewish law for the
punishment they requested which was stoning , so they
were stoned. After that, in Mohammed's lifetime, after
Gabriel (who is the voice of God in Islam just as in Christianity) revealed to him Islamic law such as not drinking
alcohol, etc, and there not being any provisions for
stoning for punishment, not another single person,
Muslim or otherwise, was ever again stoned in his
lifetime. There are other secular punishments that are carried out in the
name of Sharia Law which are also not in the Quran, such as
100 lashes for adultery. The punishment in the Quran,
after 4 eyewitnesses testify that they saw the adultery,
is flogging, which is felt by the skin and not muscle and
bone. In other words, it is more or less a spanking meant
to shame the offending party rather than a brutal beating. But
you will hear about instances such as a recent one in Iraq where they lash
adulterers bloody. But, it is done under false Sharia Law
that is not derived from the Quran. It is important for everyone to shed their ignorance and understand that just like Christian majority countries, no Muslim country is
close to perfect (follows the Quran and has proper Sharia
law), because people run countries
and people the world over are predominantly self
centered, greedy, dishonest, sometimes physically, but
much more often and worse, intellectually lazy. The intellectual sloth is
why a majority of people come to believe such garbage
as this, the supposed conspiracy that killed JFK, that blew up
the WTC after the planes hit, etc. All these lies are now
"truth" to a majority of Americans who are supremely self-
centered and intellectually lazy, who let anyone crap this
feces into their skulls as long as it fits with their pre-
conceived ignorant beliefs, prejudices and fears. When we
reach positions of power, we either use our positions for
our own greedy ends or as happens most often, we are
just lazy, don't do our job and the people depending on
us to do our jobs suffer & don't get served. But Christianity historically or presently is no
different or better (IF YOU KNOW
ANYTHING ABOUT CHRISTIANITY IN HISTORY). We twist
the words in our Book, we change the word in our Book have a much bloodier oppressive
past and continue the repression, supression, barbarisms and even terrorism
to this day in more sophisticated ways.It's just that when a Christian commits a terrorist act, no mention in the Western press is made of his religious affliation, whereas if a Muslim does, his religious affilation is always mentioned, which causes the ignorant masses to irrationally fear all Muslims. Most American Xtians are pridefully ignorant of (and secretly ignorant of their own religion) the fact that the Muslim committing the crime has violated his oaths as a Muslim & committed an unpardonable sin just as the Xtian terrorists did when they bomb clinics and kill people. Real Muslims
follow the same 10 Commandments, but follow much stricter much more comrehensive, more civilized
rules in the Quran than Xtians about how they treat one another and behave in general,
such as it being a sin to talk about others behind their
backs. They also know
much more about Xtianity than the average person
claiming to be Xtian. In a prominent translation of the
Quran there is a reference to stoning adulterers. However
it is important to note 2 things about the Quran, the
most important of which is that the translated versions are
not the Quran. The Quran is only in Arabic, is closely
gaurded has not been altered for 1,400 years (unlike the
Bible which gets continuous revisions). In the Arabic
version, the Arabic word that was translated to English,
actually means "punishment" not "stoning." So I said to
my Muslim teacher "the translator is an *sshole, don't
you think?" But he refused to say anything because it is
against his religion to judge or speak negatively about
other Muslims. (but he never speaks about anyone negatively, Muslim or otherwise) He and other Muslims I know, unlike you
and I, never ever speaks derisively about others. However, there are extensive and strict rules about Muslims having to speak out and oppose all wrong doing, whether it is social or political. When
was the last time you could say any of that about any Xtians? Finally, you can ask "are you becoming Muslim?" and I would have to answer "No, because I feel I am too lazy to live up to the moral, ethical and intellectual strictures required of a good, faithful practicing Muslim who does not have Jesus as a scapegoat for her sins." Even the name "Jesus" is false for the prophet Muslims call "Isa". Jesus is actually translated from Greek to Latin and originated from the Hebrew name Yehoshua, phonetically spelled, and which is accurately translated to Joshua. So Xtianity has even gotten the name wrong of the prophet that they call Jesus and "God"!
girl is stoned to death (GRAPHIC) because she did not
want to be the bride of an old Muslim man. This is what
Liberals want in AMERICA! I will fight these sorry excuses
for human beings with ALL I AM! God bless this poor
child!"
Response from Calista Lucille on FB: You idiots. She was stoned
because she fell in love with a Muslim boy. IDIOTS> The
people stoning her are yezidi. She was being hidden and
protected by a Sunni Muslim Imam (my note: I'm assuming
that this writer added the redundant "Muslim" to
Sunni & Imam because she was betting that her ignorant,
ethnocentric audience wouldn't know a Sunni Imam
from a Toyota Corolla!) for weeks, IGNORANT
ASSHOLES! You put Arabic soundtrack over it to make it
look like its Muslims. You are liars and idiots. before you
rush to judgment you should investigate. You want
sources?
17 year old Kurdish girl stoned to death in Kurdistan of
Iraq
According to report by Human Rights Organization of
Kurdistan a 17 year old Kurdish girl named DOA (name
translation: prayer) was publicly stoned to death in... the
Kurdistan province of Iraq . Doa was born to a Yazidi
sect which is a religious minority of the Kurds. Doa was
in a relationship with a Sunni Muslim boy that she
wanted to marry.
At a tribal court, Doa was sentenced to death by stoning.
This gruesome act was filmed but due to the extremely
graphic nature of this film it is not being posted.
Stop Child Execution Campaign strongly condemn such
inhumane practices and requests Government of Iraq,
United States, United Nations, other governments,
human rights organizations and media to demand an
international inquiry to this crime against a young child
and to hold those responsible accountable for this crime
A teenage girl was stoned to death for loving the wrong
boy. Du’a Khalil Aswad, a 17-year old Yezidi girl who
lived in Northern Iraq, fell in love with a Sunni Muslim
boy, and possibly converted to Islam. For this she was
stoned to death in a public "honour killing" which was
recorded on video and spread on the internet (warning:
graphic and disturbing. YouTube took theirs down.) 23
Yezidis have been killed in retaliation. [Via
Disinformation.]
And "she" (stoning victim) Has a Name,
Du'a
Before reading Calista Lucille's post research above, before I
knew any details about this incident, I wrote the following about the FB post that this blog post starts with. Based on my ongoing study of Islam, I wrote: "This
is not Sharia Law. This is a country, region or tribe with
barbaric secular laws claiming to follow Sharia Law that
is not. I am sick of ignorant people letting
strangers literally open the top of your skulls and defecate
"news" about incidents in your brains like this that you
believe and repeat even though you don't know the
source, don't know the subject and don't know the
motive of the reporting party even who the reporter is. If you were a real Muslim, you
would be breaking real Sharia Law.
This falls under part of my axiom that "everything
works fine on paper until people get involved and then
nothing works." But when I say that, I am talking
primarily about Chrisianity& capitalism. All sorts of
horrors have been perpetrated in the name of both and
capitalism recently failed in this country in case you
didn't notice. All Sharia Law is derived from the Quran.
There is no stoning punishment in the Quran. There is ,
only in the Quran stories that Mohammed had
2-3 people stoned in two isntances who came to him and repeatedly
instisted on being punished for their sins. In one
instance the person wanted to be stoned for adultery and
in the other the person wanted to be punished lightly.
But having no Muslim law that covered their requests and
them being Jewish, Mohammed looked to Jewish law for the
punishment they requested which was stoning , so they
were stoned. After that, in Mohammed's lifetime, after
Gabriel (who is the voice of God in Islam just as in Christianity) revealed to him Islamic law such as not drinking
alcohol, etc, and there not being any provisions for
stoning for punishment, not another single person,
Muslim or otherwise, was ever again stoned in his
lifetime. There are other secular punishments that are carried out in the
name of Sharia Law which are also not in the Quran, such as
100 lashes for adultery. The punishment in the Quran,
after 4 eyewitnesses testify that they saw the adultery,
is flogging, which is felt by the skin and not muscle and
bone. In other words, it is more or less a spanking meant
to shame the offending party rather than a brutal beating. But
you will hear about instances such as a recent one in Iraq where they lash
adulterers bloody. But, it is done under false Sharia Law
that is not derived from the Quran. It is important for everyone to shed their ignorance and understand that just like Christian majority countries, no Muslim country is
close to perfect (follows the Quran and has proper Sharia
law), because people run countries
and people the world over are predominantly self
centered, greedy, dishonest, sometimes physically, but
much more often and worse, intellectually lazy. The intellectual sloth is
why a majority of people come to believe such garbage
as this, the supposed conspiracy that killed JFK, that blew up
the WTC after the planes hit, etc. All these lies are now
"truth" to a majority of Americans who are supremely self-
centered and intellectually lazy, who let anyone crap this
feces into their skulls as long as it fits with their pre-
conceived ignorant beliefs, prejudices and fears. When we
reach positions of power, we either use our positions for
our own greedy ends or as happens most often, we are
just lazy, don't do our job and the people depending on
us to do our jobs suffer & don't get served. But Christianity historically or presently is no
different or better (IF YOU KNOW
ANYTHING ABOUT CHRISTIANITY IN HISTORY). We twist
the words in our Book, we change the word in our Book have a much bloodier oppressive
past and continue the repression, supression, barbarisms and even terrorism
to this day in more sophisticated ways.It's just that when a Christian commits a terrorist act, no mention in the Western press is made of his religious affliation, whereas if a Muslim does, his religious affilation is always mentioned, which causes the ignorant masses to irrationally fear all Muslims. Most American Xtians are pridefully ignorant of (and secretly ignorant of their own religion) the fact that the Muslim committing the crime has violated his oaths as a Muslim & committed an unpardonable sin just as the Xtian terrorists did when they bomb clinics and kill people. Real Muslims
follow the same 10 Commandments, but follow much stricter much more comrehensive, more civilized
rules in the Quran than Xtians about how they treat one another and behave in general,
such as it being a sin to talk about others behind their
backs. They also know
much more about Xtianity than the average person
claiming to be Xtian. In a prominent translation of the
Quran there is a reference to stoning adulterers. However
it is important to note 2 things about the Quran, the
most important of which is that the translated versions are
not the Quran. The Quran is only in Arabic, is closely
gaurded has not been altered for 1,400 years (unlike the
Bible which gets continuous revisions). In the Arabic
version, the Arabic word that was translated to English,
actually means "punishment" not "stoning." So I said to
my Muslim teacher "the translator is an *sshole, don't
you think?" But he refused to say anything because it is
against his religion to judge or speak negatively about
other Muslims. (but he never speaks about anyone negatively, Muslim or otherwise) He and other Muslims I know, unlike you
and I, never ever speaks derisively about others. However, there are extensive and strict rules about Muslims having to speak out and oppose all wrong doing, whether it is social or political. When
was the last time you could say any of that about any Xtians? Finally, you can ask "are you becoming Muslim?" and I would have to answer "No, because I feel I am too lazy to live up to the moral, ethical and intellectual strictures required of a good, faithful practicing Muslim who does not have Jesus as a scapegoat for her sins." Even the name "Jesus" is false for the prophet Muslims call "Isa". Jesus is actually translated from Greek to Latin and originated from the Hebrew name Yehoshua, phonetically spelled, and which is accurately translated to Joshua. So Xtianity has even gotten the name wrong of the prophet that they call Jesus and "God"!
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Classic Example of Bobbi's axiom
This post is in the form of a recent exchange of email with a friend. I turned the exchange up side down here, from earliest repsonse at the top to latest entry in the exchange at the bottom etc:
Me: (from Wikipedia): However, Muslims believe that humans have altered the Injil (arguably: the New Testament or the four Gospels), therefore, the Injil now does not represent the full truth, as given by God.[citation needed] Moses received the Books of Moses, and Abraham the Books of Abraham. David gave humankind the Zabur (Psalms). Saleh is responsible for the Dhikr, which is a practice that focuses on the remembrance of God. It often includes the repetition of the names of God. On the other hand, Muhammad received the Qu'ran, which Muslims regard as the purest and truest holy book of God. In Islam, tradition states that Muhammad received this scripture through divine revelation by the angel Jibreel (Gabriel). Its purpose was to perfect the beliefs of the one true God, because of the turning away of the Jews and Christians from the true religion, into dogmas and doctrines. Muslims mistrust the books followed by Christians and Jews principally because of perceived over-frequent and inaccurate translations: they suspect that personal notes of self-appointed apostles or the opinions and explanations of one person or another have crept into the original texts over time.
Islam, however, from its very beginnings, separated the word of God from the word of Muhammad, and from the words of people regarding the life of Muhammad - to avoid[citation needed] such a confusion. Muslims regard the words of the Qu'ran as fully accurate and unchangeable; they maintain that one cannot doubt their truth for they are the same everywhere[citation needed]. On the other hand, Islamic tradition separates the words of Muhammad and the stories recorded about Muhammad into several different books based on accuracy, trust of source or possible degree of inaccuracy. Not all quotations ascribed to Muhammad are necessarily true ones."
Friend: and they should have added that the majority of Muslims in the world today follow these transcripts of the words of Muhammad (even though they may be full of inaccuracies) instead of following the Quran.
I (at least in my head, and to a few people I know) refer to most Muslims these days as Muhammadans, they are not true Muslims. They recite the Quran, but forget that the Quran is the book to follow not the hadiths.
Me: Fine. But I don't give a rat's ass about anyone but you because the rats don't car about me so why should I them? Do you personally know that "On the other hand, Islamic tradition separates the words of Muhammad and the stories recorded about Muhammad into several different books based on accuracy, trust of source or possible degree of inaccuracy. Not all quotations ascribed to Muhammad are necessarily true ones?" Do you know the books and their order in terms of accuracy? (I don't) By the way, Islam (this specific issue) is a classic example of my axiom "Everything works on paper but nothing works correctly in reality." Possibly, we are so effed up that not even God can get it right with us?
Me: (from Wikipedia): However, Muslims believe that humans have altered the Injil (arguably: the New Testament or the four Gospels), therefore, the Injil now does not represent the full truth, as given by God.[citation needed] Moses received the Books of Moses, and Abraham the Books of Abraham. David gave humankind the Zabur (Psalms). Saleh is responsible for the Dhikr, which is a practice that focuses on the remembrance of God. It often includes the repetition of the names of God. On the other hand, Muhammad received the Qu'ran, which Muslims regard as the purest and truest holy book of God. In Islam, tradition states that Muhammad received this scripture through divine revelation by the angel Jibreel (Gabriel). Its purpose was to perfect the beliefs of the one true God, because of the turning away of the Jews and Christians from the true religion, into dogmas and doctrines. Muslims mistrust the books followed by Christians and Jews principally because of perceived over-frequent and inaccurate translations: they suspect that personal notes of self-appointed apostles or the opinions and explanations of one person or another have crept into the original texts over time.
Islam, however, from its very beginnings, separated the word of God from the word of Muhammad, and from the words of people regarding the life of Muhammad - to avoid[citation needed] such a confusion. Muslims regard the words of the Qu'ran as fully accurate and unchangeable; they maintain that one cannot doubt their truth for they are the same everywhere[citation needed]. On the other hand, Islamic tradition separates the words of Muhammad and the stories recorded about Muhammad into several different books based on accuracy, trust of source or possible degree of inaccuracy. Not all quotations ascribed to Muhammad are necessarily true ones."
Friend: and they should have added that the majority of Muslims in the world today follow these transcripts of the words of Muhammad (even though they may be full of inaccuracies) instead of following the Quran.
I (at least in my head, and to a few people I know) refer to most Muslims these days as Muhammadans, they are not true Muslims. They recite the Quran, but forget that the Quran is the book to follow not the hadiths.
Me: Fine. But I don't give a rat's ass about anyone but you because the rats don't car about me so why should I them? Do you personally know that "On the other hand, Islamic tradition separates the words of Muhammad and the stories recorded about Muhammad into several different books based on accuracy, trust of source or possible degree of inaccuracy. Not all quotations ascribed to Muhammad are necessarily true ones?" Do you know the books and their order in terms of accuracy? (I don't) By the way, Islam (this specific issue) is a classic example of my axiom "Everything works on paper but nothing works correctly in reality." Possibly, we are so effed up that not even God can get it right with us?
Some Levity
I'm currently actually a student of Islam, but this is funny and worth repeating.
Subject: BOOM
"Suicide Bombers to go on Strike"
Muslim suicide bombers in Britain are set to begin a three-day strike
on Monday in a dispute over the number of virgins they are entitled to
in the afterlife. Emergency talks with Al Qaeda have so far failed to
produce an agreement. The unrest began last Tuesday when Al Qaeda
announced that the number of virgins a suicide bomber would receive
after his death will be cut by 25% this February, from 72 to only 60.
The rationale for the cut was the increase in recent years of the
number of suicide bombings and a subsequent shortage of virgins in the
afterlife.
The suicide bomber's union, the British Organization of Occupational
Martyrs (BOOM) responded with a statement that this was unacceptable
to its members and immediately balloted for strike action. General
Secretary Abdullah Amir told the press, "Our members are literally
working themselves to death in the cause of Jihad. We don't ask for
much in return, and to be treated like this is like a kick in the
teeth." Speaking from his shed in Tipton in the West Midlands, in
which he currently resides, Al Qaeda chief executive Osama bin Laden
explained, "We sympathize with our workers concerns, but Al Qaeda is
simply not in a position to meet their demands.
They are simply not accepting the realities of modern-day Jihad in a
competitive marketplace. "Thanks to Western depravity there is now a
chronic shortage of virgins in the afterlife. It's a straight choice
between reducing expenditure and laying people off. don't like
cutting wages but I'd hate to have to tell 3,000 of my staff that they
won't be able to blow themselves up." Spokespersons for the Union in
the north east of England, Ireland, Wales and the entire Australian
continent stated that the strike would not affect their operations, as
"there are no virgins in their areas anyway."
Apparently the drop in the number of suicide bombings has been put
down to the emergence of Scottish singing star Susan Boyle - now that
Muslims know what an actual virgin looks like they are not so keen on
going to paradise.
Subject: BOOM
"Suicide Bombers to go on Strike"
Muslim suicide bombers in Britain are set to begin a three-day strike
on Monday in a dispute over the number of virgins they are entitled to
in the afterlife. Emergency talks with Al Qaeda have so far failed to
produce an agreement. The unrest began last Tuesday when Al Qaeda
announced that the number of virgins a suicide bomber would receive
after his death will be cut by 25% this February, from 72 to only 60.
The rationale for the cut was the increase in recent years of the
number of suicide bombings and a subsequent shortage of virgins in the
afterlife.
The suicide bomber's union, the British Organization of Occupational
Martyrs (BOOM) responded with a statement that this was unacceptable
to its members and immediately balloted for strike action. General
Secretary Abdullah Amir told the press, "Our members are literally
working themselves to death in the cause of Jihad. We don't ask for
much in return, and to be treated like this is like a kick in the
teeth." Speaking from his shed in Tipton in the West Midlands, in
which he currently resides, Al Qaeda chief executive Osama bin Laden
explained, "We sympathize with our workers concerns, but Al Qaeda is
simply not in a position to meet their demands.
They are simply not accepting the realities of modern-day Jihad in a
competitive marketplace. "Thanks to Western depravity there is now a
chronic shortage of virgins in the afterlife. It's a straight choice
between reducing expenditure and laying people off. don't like
cutting wages but I'd hate to have to tell 3,000 of my staff that they
won't be able to blow themselves up." Spokespersons for the Union in
the north east of England, Ireland, Wales and the entire Australian
continent stated that the strike would not affect their operations, as
"there are no virgins in their areas anyway."
Apparently the drop in the number of suicide bombings has been put
down to the emergence of Scottish singing star Susan Boyle - now that
Muslims know what an actual virgin looks like they are not so keen on
going to paradise.
Labels:
72,
afterlife,
comedy,
extremism,
funny,
humorous,
martyr,
muslim,
religious,
terrorism,
virgins,
war on terrror
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)